Google Asus Chromebook Review

Let me start off with saying that I am an Apple girl.

I own a Macbook Pro, an iPad mini and an iPhone 5s. However, I do like new technology and I jumped at the chance to try out the Asus Chromebook C200.

The first difference that I notice using the Chromebook is how light it is. At 2.5 pounds, the Chromebook gave my back a break from hauling my 4.5 pound Macbook. Though it is worthy to note that their size are quite different, it is still very light.

I am also very impressed with it's battery life. I would often go through three weekdays before I need to charge. This makes it a lot more convenient as well as I do not need to haul around boxy chargers or constantly look for an electric outlet to charge.

Aside from that, it is quite a limited device.

You're most likely going to be staring at the Google Chrome browser, going from tab to tab. There are options for split screening so you can multitask, but I did have to look it up and press a few buttons to make it work.

There are various apps for the Chromebook through the Chrome Web Store, including Spotify, Skype, Netflix, etc and it's growing - so there is an incredible potential in how the Chromebook is used to do various other activities.

But for now, it is still limited to run Applications and Programs that might be necessary for others such as Audacity or Photoshop for example since they do not have it on a browser platform.

In my opinion, the Chromebook could be useful if you have an array of apps you know you would need and use, which could take quite some time exploring the vast number of apps available. It is practical for students as well to take notes through the browser version of Evernote, or simply in Microsoft Word.

However, there were times when I tried downloading a Word document, and it didn't open. It might perhaps due to an old version of the Word file, but it did cause some issues.

Conclusively, Chromebooks to me is an okay device. It isn't the greatest with the best specifications. It has fewer features and processing power than the usual Macbooks or Windows laptop, but at the $200-300 price tag, it is not bad. It is limited to do what a browser can do - but a browser has been increasingly powerful with more and more applications and programs being developed. It is great for the day to day use of students who go from class to class taking notes and doing homework and writing papers, but it's certainly not adequate to replace a traditional laptop in doing things that require more than just a browser - no matter how great Chrome is.

Module 2: Digital Story

This past week, I've been busy with working on my Digital Story project.

Basically, a digital story is a way of narrating a certain personal event in a way that is informative and interactive through a video format, constructed through technological tools such as Audacity and WeVideo.

I enjoyed the concept of it, as I think it would be a great tool for my students who could not stand Powerpoints and would prefer videos that they could later rewatch and review outside of class. It is also presented in a personal, narrative style which could appeal to students who best learn that way.

Though as a teacher I think it is a great way to accommodate to my students with differentiated instruction, as a student I don't enjoy it quite as much. I notice that when I was making the voice narration I had to slow down a lot in my speaking and when constructing the video, the pace is much slower than I would like. As a learner I prefer engaging, spirited discussion and so this does not appeal to me.

I also did not like that WeVideo only provides the Ken Burns effect for transitions (or that I know of), because there are certain points in which I feel I wanted it to be more instantaneous and fast paced and thus prefer the fast slide shows. Ken Burns effect is great at creating movement in still images but I think it forces to make things go really slowly and can be boring.

Overall, the digital story project could be a good assignment for students to do, but am hoping for a transitional effect that is not annoying like most random powerpoint animation, but faster and more exciting than the Ken Burns effect.

Module 1 - Jigsaw, Putting the Pieces Together

The Jigsaw Method is a way of teaching that lets students learn new concepts and then be responsible in teaching a group of their peers that unique information and learning from the other students of their other topics. This enables them to learn independently through discovery.

            I think this is effective because then the students are being held accountable and responsible with their learning, as if not, the other students would also miss out on the information that he/she is supposed to learn. It also gives them ownership of their own learning, as they are asked to be active in the learning process instead of being passive listeners of lectures or be easily distracted with other thoughts. The Jigsaw Method requires them to be focused in group discussions and be responsible for their peers understanding, and thus he/she will feel compelled to master it that they can even reach the Evaluating stage of the Bloom’s Taxanomy of Learning, which is quite high already. They evaluate when they are teaching, as they would see what they had learn and try to answer their peer’s questions in regards to it.

            As I want to be an English teacher for secondary students, I think I could implement this method in different ways. I could have the students be in groups studying different characters (both main and supporting characters) and how each character of the story affected the plot, and as they gather together in their jigsaw groups, they’ll be able to learn how purposeful and important all of the characters are in forming the story.

           I think my teachers in the past have implemented the Jigsaw Method, but I don’t really recall any specific ones. However, the Jigsaw lesson we experienced in our Technology in Education by Dr. Snoeyink was effective, as I find myself feeling engaged the entire duration of the lesson, which doesn’t really happen often with me. It is also a good way for me to learn as I am a social person and do best when interacting with others, and thus learning different online tools through this method was definitely more effective for me than if Dr. Snoeyink just taught all of the different tools in the class. The smaller groups also allowed me to ask questions more openly without worrying about the time wasted/spent on other people’s questions, and thus it would go more effectively.